Spring Into Success with Team-Based Learning

UTHSC faculty and staff gathered on March 26, 2013 for a Team-Based Learning (TBL) workshop, facilitated by Andrea Franks and Michelle Farland from the Department of Clinical Pharmacy in the College of Pharmacy.

Andrea-Michelle

Faculty from 3 colleges presented on the use of TBL with specific courses and groups of learners, from 1st year through residency training. Access the MediaSite recording of the college presentations here.

TBL-session-presentations

After our college presenters, the workshop facilitators took over and led a dynamic, interactive, team-based learning session. Below you’ll see pictures of groups working on the Individual Readiness Assessment Test (IRAT) and the Team Readiness Assessment Test (TRAT).

IRAT

TRAT

Our Memphis faculty thank Drs. Frank and Farland for coming to Memphis on a cool Spring day!

Ideas coming out of this session included the need for sessions focused on:

  • using MedEdPORTAL
  • TBL 101
  • becoming a facilitator for TBL and not a lecturer

Spring into success with Team-Based Learning 2013

Join colleagues at the TBL workshop scheduled for Tuesday, March 26 from 12:30pm to 5:00pm, GEB A104. Click here to register for the session.

Previous UTHSC programming has focused on explaining team-based learning (TBL) and highlighting its benefits for application in health professions education. This workshop is designed for faculty currently using or implementing TBL, and extends beyond basic understanding of TBL methods.  Using a TBL structure, participants will be placed in teams to simulate the readiness assurance process and too discuss cases that address important TBL challenges such as peer evaluation, team assignment, team teaching, and facilitation skills.

Schedule:

12:30-1:00 Lunch

1:00-1:05 Welcome and Overview

1:05-2:20 This Works for Me / My TBL Experience

  • Mark Bugnitz – TBL in pediatric residency training
  • Ann Nolen – TBL in occupational therapy
  • Vicki Park – TBL in Medicine & published in MedEdPORTAL
  • Mark Scarbecz – TBL in dentistry
  • Trevor Sweatman & Chasity Shelton – TBL in an interprofessional session

2:20-2:30 Break

2:30-4:30 Workshop

  • Facilitators: Drs. Andrea Franks & Michelle Farland

4:30-5:00 Q&A / Wrap-Up / Discussion

Faculty who’ve tried TBL overwhelmingly stick with it because of how well it works for the type of content and students of today. Come learn more about TBL from and with your colleagues.

Team-based learning at Stanford.

Team-based learning at Stanford.

Riding the Storm: Improving Course Performance/Interaction through Analytics and Proactive Methods of Engagement

Today’s Friday Focus on e-Learning was a replay of a a session from the 18th annual Sloan Consortium Conference on Online Learning held in October 2012. The presenter was John Vivolo, Manager of Online Learning, Polytechnic Institute of New York University.

Most learning management systems (LMSs) can generate numbers that can be placed in spreadsheets to proactively make alterations in the course (as the course is taking place).

Reactive – make changes to a course AFTER poor student performance on an assignment/exam. Student evaluations are an example of reactive. Academic department evaluations are also typically reactive (done at end of semester).

Proactive – set up preventive measures prior to an assignment/exam. Time-based, Individual assignments/content, Discussion boards.

Interaction: student-student, student-faculty, student activities.

1. Time-based activity – days of the week, times of day, days of month. Can influence improvements in content availability, assignment due dates, virtual office hours, etc… When are students going in and doing activities in the course?

What is your goal?

  • To accommodate student schedules? To reach the class at peak activity? Solution: Make content available at the peak of activity or right beforehand.
  • To create an equal distribution of activity through the week? Solution: Make content available at the lowest point of activity. Global solution: Create an “Interaction policy” (proactive). This policy would refer to student & faculty interactions, as well as when students are expected to go in to get various items from the course (or complete specific activities).

2. Individual Assignments/Content: Hits – track how often students view a content item. Goal: Avoid a wait and see approach.

How to use the numbers of how many times students clicked on a podcast? If they are clicking on it a lot (far more than the # of students in the class) then it could indicate that they are having trouble with the content (don’t understand content).

If they’re clicking on content a LOT, then before moving on (or before the next exam) provide:

  • discussion board Q& A
  • create a review sheet
  • host a review webinar
  • create a non-graded quiz

If one student seems to be accessing the content over and above others, reach out to that specific student to see if s/he has questions.

3. Discussion boards – the most commonly used interactive tool. Purpose: simulate an in-class discussion but in an asynchronous method.

Common discussion board goal – create a discussion that remains a fluid conversation over the week.

Can create discussion board interaction policy – respond to initial question, post at least once before X day, may have more than one topic or thread, etc…

Alerts can be set in Blackboard:

  • attendance alerts – students/faculty don’t access course in X amount of time
  • assignment/content alerts – student does not access content or assignment
  • due date alerts – student has not submitted assignment (before/after) due date

Managers/Directors

  • can use analytics for online faculty oversight
  • data can be collected for faculty – are they interaction; what and how are they interacting

Q&A at end of session:

  1. Do faculty feed the analytics back to the students – “this is what I’m seeing” – Presenter recommends NOT to feed the analytics back to the students. He believes students will feel as if they are being watched.
  2. Who runs the analytics reports? The Manager of Online Learning runs them, distributes to faculty, and then faculty do what they will with the information.
  3. Is the Interaction Policy something that is set centrally (overall), by college or department or faculty? It’s variable.

How do YOU use analytics to assess performance and/or adjust your courses?